A 30 minute opening range, taken both ways.
5,184 combinations tested on 1 year of Nasdaq 100 New York sessions. 1,204 cleared the constraints, and this one sits in the middle of the widest working zone on the grid.
Five strategies that already work. Pick one, press optimise, and Edge Lab tests every version of it against years of real sessions to find the version that holds up on your instrument and your session. Then you copy the settings straight into an indicator.
Included with Pro · no course, no signal groupSweep a strategy’s settings against real sessions, and see which held up.
5,184 combinations tested on 1 year of Nasdaq 100 New York sessions. 1,204 cleared the constraints, and this one sits in the middle of the widest working zone on the grid.
A course, a Discord, and one set of settings that came from nowhere.
Five strategies that already work, and a system that finds your version of one.
Every number on this page came from a test you can rerun yourself.
Each one is a documented, widely traded structure with its own swept parameters. Nothing invented here, nothing named after anybody.
Choose one of the five, then the instrument, the session and how far back to test. Three decisions on one screen. Everything else has a sensible default, and every dial is still there if you want it.
The system tests every combination of stop, target, entry and filter against up to two years of real sessions, then re-runs the whole search across five rolling windows and judges each window's winner only on the dates that came after it. That part is not optional and you cannot switch it off.
Pick the instrument and the algo in the rail on the left. A preset picks the grid for you.
Every combination runs against real sessions, net of commission and slippage.
The one that survived, in plain English, with the full report behind it.
You get one recommendation in plain English, the numbers behind it, and a settings sheet. Copy or download it, set an indicator to those exact values, and the strategy is drawn on your chart the way it was tested.
5,184 combinations tested on 1 year of Nasdaq 100 New York sessions. 1,204 cleared the constraints, and this one sits in the middle of the widest working zone on the grid.
Rank a sweep by profit and the top row is usually one bright cell surrounded by cold ones. It made the most money in the test and it will not do it again, because nothing either side of it worked.
Edge Lab looks for the plateau instead, a block of settings where the neighbours work too. A version that only pays at exactly 0.6× stop is fitted. One that pays from 0.5× to 0.8× is real, and it is the one you can trade without standing on the edge of a cliff.
Slicing one already-chosen setting's trades by date is not out-of-sample: those dates picked the setting. So each of the five windows re-runs the whole optimisation over its own training dates, then measures the winner that fit produced on the dates immediately after it. No test date ever contributed to the fit being judged on it.
A result is compared against the distribution of the best cell a search this wide would find in shuffled data, not against one pre-chosen cell. Run the naive version through a 200-cell grid on pure noise and it declares significance 200 times out of 200. Correcting for the search is the difference between a p-value and a decoration.
A p-value across eleven trades is a confident-looking figure with nothing behind it. Below thirty trades, or fewer than three usable windows, the honest output is that the sample cannot support the claim, not a number with a caveat beside it.
Research that ends in a PDF changes nothing. A sweep ends in a configuration. The run exports as a settings sheet, every row named for what the algo actually did rather than the field it was stored in, so an indicator set to those values draws the strategy exactly as it was tested.
See the indicatorsPick a strategy, run the sweep, copy the settings. The first one takes about five minutes.